Diving is Safe
"DIVING" INJURY HISTORY VERSUS COMPETITIVE DIVING
SAFETY RECORD
From US Diving's "Diving Safety" March 1993
(The reader must have some familiarity with the literature before
facts and figures may be interpreted. Many of these sources are
not readily available. Some are highly technical. The decision was
made to present the literature by agency.)
The data collection in the "diving" injury research began with
general categories. These data collection systems made the incidence
of "diving" related cervical spine injury known as a public health
hazard that needed to be assessed. The large information collection
systems lumped ‘diving’ accident data into a generic "diving" category.
Readers confused the activity of "diving" with the sport of competitive
diving. The resulting misinformation has grossly distorted the safety
record of competitive diving. Administrators and insurance underwriters
reading that "Sports Diving" was the fourth ranked category of SCI
understandably moved to take diving boards out. Diving boards have
been removed from motel and apartment pools as well from pools used
by competitive divers with a blindfold mentality
NATIONAL ELECTRONIC INJURY SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM OF THE U.S. CONSUMER
PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION (NEISS-CPSC) NElSS-CPSC is a national
injury information clearinghouse.
NEISS issues the following caution, “NEISS data and estimates are
based on injuries treated in hospital emergency rooms that patients
say are related to products. Therefore it is incorrect, when using
NEISS data, to say the injuries were caused by the product.’
According to the Lancaster Report text, “Of the 3.4 million sports
injuries reported by emergency rooms in 1977 to the U.S. Consumer
Products Safety Commission the general category of ‘Swimming (pools,
diving, scuba)’ rated number nine... behind the categories of ‘Football’,
‘Basketball’, ‘Motorbikes’, ‘Playground Equipment’, and Kickball,
Stickball, Tetherball, Other Ball Games’.
The CPSC has refined its information gathering activity since 1979
considerably. Sports associated with specific apparatus are now
documented in terms of the safety record of the "consumer product"
upon which they rely. From NEISS sample data, national estimates
are generated using statistical techniques. In 1984 under the still
broadly inclusive category of “Diving or Diving Boards” there were
271 counts of injury. The national estimate was 14,526 with a .15
Coefficient of Variance (CV) i.e. Relative Standard Error. This
represents more clearly-delineated reporting since “Swimming Pools,
Not Specified” is another category for which the national estimate
for injury was 39,760
In 1984 "Diving or Diving Boards’ ranked number fourteen with such
categories as ‘Bleachers, ‘Golf (Activity, Apparel or Equipment)’
and Bowling (Activity, Apparel or Equipment)’ recording higher national
estimates for injury. However, as late as May of 1986, upon inquiry
by Merna Dawson on behalf of the LSDBC, a letter from the U.S. Consumer
Product Safety Commission indicated that statistics could not be
provided by the National Injury Information Clearinghouse for springboards
only.
|